Regression introduced by 16bd984557 and
5b177b3cab
The pre-computed absolute values used in encode_mcu_AC_first() and
encode_mcu_AC_refine() were stored in a JCOEF (signed short) array.
When attempting to losslessly transform a specially-crafted malformed
12-bit JPEG image with a coefficient value of -32768 into a progressive
12-bit JPEG image, the progressive Huffman encoder attempted to store
the absolute value of -32768 in the JCOEF array, thus overflowing the
16-bit signed data type. Therefore, at this point in the code:
8c5e78ce29/jcphuff.c (L889)
the absolute value was read as -32768, which caused the test at
8c5e78ce29/jcphuff.c (L896)
to fail, falling through to
8c5e78ce29/jcphuff.c (L908)
with an overly large value of r (46) that, when shifted left four
places, incremented, and passed to emit_symbol(), exceeded the maximum
index (255) for the derived code tables. Fortunately, the buffer
overrun was fully contained within phuff_entropy_encoder, so the issue
did not generate a segfault or other user-visible errant behavior, but
it did cause a UBSan failure that was detected by OSS-Fuzz.
This commit introduces an unsigned JCOEF (UJCOEF) data type and uses it
to store the absolute values of DCT coefficients computed by the
AC_first_prepare() and AC_refine_prepare() methods.
Note that the changes to the Arm Neon progressive Huffman encoder
extensions cause signed 16-bit instructions to be replaced with
equivalent unsigned 16-bit instructions, so the changes should be
performance-neutral.
Based on:
bbf61c0382Closes#628
... on platforms that support TLS, which should include all
currently-supported platforms
(https://libjpeg-turbo.org/Documentation/OfficialBinaries)
Addresses a concern raised in #87
Although it is still my opinion that the data race in init_simd() was
innocuous, we can now fix it for free thanks to
ae87a95861, so why not?
Referring to #408, this commit #ifdefs DSPr2 SIMD functions that only
work on little endian processors, and it completely excludes
jsimd_h2v1_downsample_dspr2() and jsimd_h2v2_downsample_dspr2(). The
latter two functions fail with the TJBench tiling regression tests, most
likely because the implementation of the functions predates those tests.
Previously, these environment variables were not honored unless a 74K
CPU was detected, but this detection doesn't work properly with QEMU's
user mode emulation. With all other CPU types, libjpeg-turbo honors
JSIMD_FORCE* regardless of CPU detection.
(for instance, when passing -msoft-float to the compiler)
The instructions used by jsimd_quantize_float_dspr2() and
jsimd_convsamp_float_dspr2() don't work with the soft float ABI, so
disable those functions when soft float is enabled.
Based on:
129a739bfaCloses#272
This commit adds C and SSE2 optimizations for the encode_mcu_AC_first()
function used in progressive Huffman encoding.
The image used for testing can be retrieved from this page:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/doubling-the-speed-of-jpegtran
All timings done on `Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4870HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz`
clang version is `Apple LLVM version 9.0.0 (clang-900.0.39.2)`
gcc-5 version is `gcc-5 (Homebrew GCC 5.5.0) 5.5.0`
gcc-7 version is `gcc-7 (Homebrew GCC 7.2.0) 7.2.0`
Here are the results in comparison to libjpeg-turbo@293263c using
`time ./jpegtran -outfile /dev/null -progressive -optimise -copy none print_poster_0025.jpg`
C
clang x86_64: +19%
gcc-5 x86_64: +80%
gcc-7 x86_64: +57%
clang i386: +5%
gcc-5 i386: +59%
gcc-7 i386: +51%
SSE2
clang x86_64: +79%
gcc-5 x86_64: +158%
gcc-7 x86_64: +122%
clang i386: +71%
gcc-5 i386: +134%
gcc-7 i386: +135%
Discussion in libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo#46
This commit adds C and SSE2 optimizations for the encode_mcu_AC_refine()
function used in progressive Huffman encoding.
The image used for testing can be retrieved from this page:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/doubling-the-speed-of-jpegtran
All timings done on `Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4870HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz`
clang version is `Apple LLVM version 9.0.0 (clang-900.0.39.2)`
gcc-5 version is `gcc-5 (Homebrew GCC 5.5.0) 5.5.0`
gcc-7 version is `gcc-7 (Homebrew GCC 7.2.0) 7.2.0`
Here are the results in comparison to libjpeg-turbo@3c54642 using
`time ./jpegtran -outfile /dev/null -progressive -optimise -copy none print_poster_0025.jpg`
C
clang x86_64: +7%
gcc-5 x86_64: +30%
gcc-7 x86_64: +33%
clang i386: +0%
gcc-5 i386: +24%
gcc-7 i386: +23%
SSE2
clang x86_64: +42%
gcc-5 x86_64: +53%
gcc-7 x86_64: +64%
clang i386: +35%
gcc-5 i386: +46%
gcc-7 i386: +49%
Discussion in libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo#46
With rare exceptions ...
- Always separate line continuation characters by one space from
preceding code.
- Always use two-space indentation. Never use tabs.
- Always use K&R-style conditional blocks.
- Always surround operators with spaces, except in raw assembly code.
- Always put a space after, but not before, a comma.
- Never put a space between type casts and variables/function calls.
- Never put a space between the function name and the argument list in
function declarations and prototypes.
- Always surround braces ('{' and '}') with spaces.
- Always surround statements (if, for, else, catch, while, do, switch)
with spaces.
- Always attach pointer symbols ('*' and '**') to the variable or
function name.
- Always precede pointer symbols ('*' and '**') by a space in type
casts.
- Use the MIN() macro from jpegint.h within the libjpeg and TurboJPEG
API libraries (using min() from tjutil.h is still necessary for
TJBench.)
- Where it makes sense (particularly in the TurboJPEG code), put a blank
line after variable declaration blocks.
- Always separate statements in one-liners by two spaces.
The purpose of this was to ease maintenance on my part and also to make
it easier for contributors to figure out how to format patch
submissions. This was admittedly confusing (even to me sometimes) when
we had 3 or 4 different style conventions in the same source tree. The
new convention is more consistent with the formatting of other OSS code
bases.
This commit corrects deviations from the chosen formatting style in the
libjpeg API code and reformats the TurboJPEG API code such that it
conforms to the same standard.
NOTES:
- Although it is no longer necessary for the function name in function
declarations to begin in Column 1 (this was historically necessary
because of the ansi2knr utility, which allowed libjpeg to be built
with non-ANSI compilers), we retain that formatting for the libjpeg
code because it improves readability when using libjpeg's function
attribute macros (GLOBAL(), etc.)
- This reformatting project was accomplished with the help of AStyle and
Uncrustify, although neither was completely up to the task, and thus
a great deal of manual tweaking was required. Note to developers of
code formatting utilities: the libjpeg-turbo code base is an
excellent test bed, because AFAICT, it breaks every single one of the
utilities that are currently available.
- The legacy (MMX, SSE, 3DNow!) assembly code for i386 has been
formatted to match the SSE2 code (refer to
ff5685d5344273df321eb63a005eaae19d2496e3.) I hadn't intended to
bother with this, but the Loongson MMI implementation demonstrated
that there is still academic value to the MMX implementation, as an
algorithmic model for other 64-bit vector implementations. Thus, it
is desirable to improve its readability in the same manner as that of
the SSE2 implementation.
+ "JSIMD_ARM_NEON" = "JSIMD_NEON"
+ "JSIMD_MIPS_DSPR2" = "JSIMD_DSPR2"
+ "*_mips_dspr2" = "*_dspr2"
It's obvious that "NEON" refers to Arm and "DSPr2" refers to MIPS, and
this naming convention is consistent with the other SIMD extensions.
