(Regression introduced by 7bb958b732)
Because of 7bb958b732, the TurboJPEG
compression and encoding functions no longer transfer the value of
TJPARAM_OPTIMIZE into cinfo->data_precision unless the data precision
is 8. The intent of that was to prevent using_std_huff_tables() from
being called more than once when reusing the same compressor object to
generate multiple 12-bit-per-sample JPEG images. However, because
cinfo->optimize_coding is always set to TRUE by jpeg_set_defaults() if
the data precision is 12, calling applications that use 12-bit data
precision had to unset cinfo->optimize_coding if they set
cinfo->arith_code after calling jpeg_set_defaults(). Because of
7bb958b732, the TurboJPEG API stopped
doing that except with 8-bit data precision. Thus, attempting to
generate a 12-bit-per-sample arithmetic-coded lossy JPEG image using
the TurboJPEG API failed with "Requested features are incompatible."
Since the compressor will always fail if cinfo->arith_code and
cinfo->optimize_coding are both set, and since cinfo->optimize_coding
has no relevance for arithmetic coding, the most robust and user-proof
solution is for jinit_c_master_control() to set cinfo->optimize_coding
to FALSE if cinfo->arith_code is TRUE.
This commit also:
- modifies TJBench so that it no longer reports that it is using
optimized baseline entropy coding in modes where that setting
is irrelevant,
- amends the cjpeg documentation to clarify that -optimize is implied
when specifying -progressive or '-precision 12' without -arithmetic,
and
- prevents jpeg_set_defaults() from uselessly checking the value of
cinfo->arith_code immediately after it has been set to FALSE.
(regression introduced by e8b40f3c2b)
The documented behavior of the libjpeg API is to compute optimal Huffman
tables when generating 12-bit lossy Huffman-coded JPEG images, unless
the calling application supplies its own Huffman tables. However,
e8b40f3c2b and
96bc40c1b3 modified
jinit_c_master_control() so that it always set cinfo->optimize_coding to
TRUE when generarating 12-bit lossy Huffman-coded JPEG images, which
prevented calling applications from supplying custom Huffman tables for
such images.
This commit modifies jinit_c_master_control() so that it only overrides
cinfo->optimize_coding when generating 12-bit lossy Huffman-coded JPEG
images if all Huffman table slots are empty or all slots contain default
Huffman tables. Determining whether the latter is true requires using
memcmp() to compare the allocated Huffman tables with the default
Huffman tables, because:
- The documented behavior of jpeg_set_defaults() is to initialize any
empty Huffman table slot with the default Huffman table corresponding
to that slot, regardless of the data precision. There is also no
requirement that the data precision be specified prior to calling
jpeg_set_defaults(). Thus, there is no reliable way to prevent
jpeg_set_defaults() from initializing empty Huffman table slots with
default Huffman tables, which are useless for 12-bit data precision.
- There is no requirement that custom Huffman tables be defined prior to
calling jpeg_set_defaults(). A calling application could call
jpeg_set_defaults() and modify the values in the default Huffman
tables rather than allocating new tables. Thus, there is no reliable
way to detect whether the allocated Huffman tables contain default
values without comparing the tables with the default Huffman tables.
Fortunately, comparing the allocated Huffman tables with the default
Huffman tables is the last stop on the logic train, so it won't happen
unless cinfo->data_precision == 12, cinfo->arith_code == FALSE,
cinfo->optimize_coding == FALSE, and one or more Huffman tables are
allocated. (If the compressor object is reused, this ensures that the
full comparison will be performed at most once.) Custom Huffman tables
will be flagged as non-default when the first non-default value is
encountered, and the worst case (comparing 400 bytes) is very fast on
modern CPUs anyhow.
Fixes#751
This actually works and apparently always has worked. It only failed
because the libjpeg code, which did not originally support arithmetic
coding, assumed that optimize_coding should always be TRUE for 12-bit
data precision.
- Rename jpeg_simple_lossless() to jpeg_enable_lossless() and modify the
function so that it stores the lossless parameters directly in the Ss
and Al fields of jpeg_compress_struct rather than using a scan script.
- Move the cjpeg -lossless switch into "Switches for advanced users".
- Document the libjpeg API and run-time features that are unavailable in
lossless mode, and ensure that all parameters, functions, and switches
related to unavailable features are ignored or generate errors in
lossless mode.
- Defer any action that depends on whether lossless mode is enabled
until jpeg_start_compress()/jpeg_start_decompress() is called.
- Document the purpose of the point transform value.
- "Codec" stands for coder/decoder, so it is a bit awkward to say
"lossless compression codec" and "lossless decompression codec".
Use "lossless compressor" and "lossless decompressor" instead.
- Restore backward API/ABI compatibility with libjpeg v6b:
* Move the new 'lossless' field from the exposed jpeg_compress_struct
and jpeg_decompress_struct structures into the opaque
jpeg_comp_master and jpeg_decomp_master structures, and allocate the
master structures in the body of jpeg_create_compress() and
jpeg_create_decompress().
* Remove the new 'process' field from jpeg_compress_struct and
jpeg_decompress_struct and replace it with the old
'progressive_mode' field and the new 'lossless' field.
* Remove the new 'data_unit' field from jpeg_compress_struct and
jpeg_decompress_struct and replace it with a locally-computed
data unit variable.
* Restore the names of macros and fields that refer to DCT blocks, and
document that they have a different meaning in lossless mode. (Most
of them aren't very meaningful in lossless mode anyhow.)
* Remove the new alloc_darray() method from jpeg_memory_mgr and
replace it with an internal macro that wraps the alloc_sarray()
method.
* Move the JDIFF* data types from jpeglib.h and jmorecfg.h into
jpegint.h.
* Remove the new 'codec' field from jpeg_compress_struct and
jpeg_decompress_struct and instead reuse the existing internal
coefficient control, forward/inverse DCT, and entropy
encoding/decoding structures for lossless compression/decompression.
* Repurpose existing error codes rather than introducing new ones.
(The new JERR_BAD_RESTART and JWRN_MUST_DOWNSCALE codes remain,
although JWRN_MUST_DOWNSCALE will probably be removed in
libjpeg-turbo, since we have a different way of handling multiple
data precisions.)
- Automatically enable lossless mode when a scan script with parameters
that are only valid for lossless mode is detected, and document the
use of scan scripts to generate lossless JPEG images.
- Move the sequential and shared Huffman routines back into jchuff.c and
jdhuff.c, and document that those routines are shared with jclhuff.c
and jdlhuff.c as well as with jcphuff.c and jdphuff.c.
- Move MAX_DIFF_BITS from jchuff.h into jclhuff.c, the only place where
it is used.
- Move the predictor and scaler code into jclossls.c and jdlossls.c.
- Streamline register usage in the [un]differencers (inspired by similar
optimizations in the color [de]converters.)
- Restructure the logic in a few places to reduce duplicated code.
- Ensure that all lossless-specific code is guarded by
C_LOSSLESS_SUPPORTED or D_LOSSLESS_SUPPORTED and that the library can
be built successfully if either or both of those macros is undefined.
- Remove all short forms of external names introduced by the lossless
JPEG patch. (These will not be needed by libjpeg-turbo, so there is
no use cleaning them up.)
- Various wordsmithing, formatting, and punctuation tweaks
- Eliminate various compiler warnings.
The Gordian knot that 7fec5074f9 attempted
to unravel was caused by the fact that there are several
data-precision-dependent (JSAMPLE-dependent) fields and methods in the
exposed libjpeg API structures, and if you change the exposed libjpeg
API structures, then you have to change the whole API. If you change
the whole API, then you have to provide a whole new library to support
the new API, and that makes it difficult to support multiple data
precisions in the same application. (It is not impossible, as example.c
demonstrated, but using data-precision-dependent libjpeg API structures
would have made the cjpeg, djpeg, and jpegtran source code hard to read,
so it made more sense to build, install, and package 12-bit-specific
versions of those applications.)
Unfortunately, the result of that initial integration effort was an
unreadable and unmaintainable mess, which is a problem for a library
that is an ISO/ITU-T reference implementation. Also, as I dug into the
problem of lossless JPEG support, I realized that 16-bit lossless JPEG
images are a thing, and supporting yet another version of the libjpeg
API just for those images is untenable.
In fact, however, the touch points for JSAMPLE in the exposed libjpeg
API structures are minimal:
- The colormap and sample_range_limit fields in jpeg_decompress_struct
- The alloc_sarray() and access_virt_sarray() methods in
jpeg_memory_mgr
- jpeg_write_scanlines() and jpeg_write_raw_data()
- jpeg_read_scanlines() and jpeg_read_raw_data()
- jpeg_skip_scanlines() and jpeg_crop_scanline()
(This is subtle, but both of those functions use JSAMPLE-dependent
opaque structures behind the scenes.)
It is much more readable and maintainable to provide 12-bit-specific
versions of those six top-level API functions and to document that the
aforementioned methods and fields must be type-cast when using 12-bit
samples. Since that eliminates the need to provide a 12-bit-specific
version of the exposed libjpeg API structures, we can:
- Compile only the precision-dependent libjpeg modules (the
coefficient buffer controllers, the colorspace converters, the
DCT/IDCT managers, the main buffer controllers, the preprocessing
and postprocessing controller, the downsampler and upsamplers, the
quantizers, the integer DCT methods, and the IDCT methods) for
multiple data precisions.
- Introduce 12-bit-specific methods into the various internal
structures defined in jpegint.h.
- Create precision-independent data type, macro, method, field, and
function names that are prefixed by an underscore, and use an
internal header to convert those into precision-dependent data
type, macro, method, field, and function names, based on the value
of BITS_IN_JSAMPLE, when compiling the precision-dependent libjpeg
modules.
- Expose precision-dependent jinit*() functions for each of the
precision-dependent libjpeg modules.
- Abstract the precision-dependent libjpeg modules by calling the
appropriate precision-dependent jinit*() function, based on the
value of cinfo->data_precision, from top-level libjpeg API
functions.
The existing /*FALLTHROUGH*/ comments work with GCC but not Clang, so
this commit adds a FALLTHROUGH macro that uses the 'fallthrough'
attribute if the compiler supports it.
Refer to https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=995993
NOTE: All versions of GCC that support -Wimplicit-fallthrough also
support the 'fallthrough' attribute, but certain other compilers (Oracle
Solaris Studio, for instance) support /*FALLTHROUGH*/ but not the
'fallthrough' attribute. Thus, this commit retains the /*FALLTHROUGH*/
comments, which have existed in the libjpeg code base in some form since
1994 (libjpeg v5.)
Closes#531
... including, but not limited to:
- unused macros
- private functions not marked as static
- unprototyped global functions
- variable shadowing
(detected by various non-default GCC 8 warning options)
- When referring to specific clauses, annexes, tables, and figures, a
"timed reference" (a reference that includes the year) must be used in
order to avoid confusion.
- "CCITT" = "ITU-T"
- Replace ambiguous "JPEG spec" with the specific document number.
Within the libjpeg API code, it seems to be more the convention than not
to separate the macro name and value by two or more spaces, which
improves general readability. Making this consistent across all of
libjpeg-turbo is less about my individual preferences and more about
making it easy to automatically detect variations from our chosen
formatting convention. I intend to release the script I'm using to
validate this stuff, once it matures and stabilizes a bit.
With rare exceptions ...
- Always separate line continuation characters by one space from
preceding code.
- Always use two-space indentation. Never use tabs.
- Always use K&R-style conditional blocks.
- Always surround operators with spaces, except in raw assembly code.
- Always put a space after, but not before, a comma.
- Never put a space between type casts and variables/function calls.
- Never put a space between the function name and the argument list in
function declarations and prototypes.
- Always surround braces ('{' and '}') with spaces.
- Always surround statements (if, for, else, catch, while, do, switch)
with spaces.
- Always attach pointer symbols ('*' and '**') to the variable or
function name.
- Always precede pointer symbols ('*' and '**') by a space in type
casts.
- Use the MIN() macro from jpegint.h within the libjpeg and TurboJPEG
API libraries (using min() from tjutil.h is still necessary for
TJBench.)
- Where it makes sense (particularly in the TurboJPEG code), put a blank
line after variable declaration blocks.
- Always separate statements in one-liners by two spaces.
The purpose of this was to ease maintenance on my part and also to make
it easier for contributors to figure out how to format patch
submissions. This was admittedly confusing (even to me sometimes) when
we had 3 or 4 different style conventions in the same source tree. The
new convention is more consistent with the formatting of other OSS code
bases.
This commit corrects deviations from the chosen formatting style in the
libjpeg API code and reformats the TurboJPEG API code such that it
conforms to the same standard.
NOTES:
- Although it is no longer necessary for the function name in function
declarations to begin in Column 1 (this was historically necessary
because of the ansi2knr utility, which allowed libjpeg to be built
with non-ANSI compilers), we retain that formatting for the libjpeg
code because it improves readability when using libjpeg's function
attribute macros (GLOBAL(), etc.)
- This reformatting project was accomplished with the help of AStyle and
Uncrustify, although neither was completely up to the task, and thus
a great deal of manual tweaking was required. Note to developers of
code formatting utilities: the libjpeg-turbo code base is an
excellent test bed, because AFAICT, it breaks every single one of the
utilities that are currently available.
- The legacy (MMX, SSE, 3DNow!) assembly code for i386 has been
formatted to match the SSE2 code (refer to
ff5685d5344273df321eb63a005eaae19d2496e3.) I hadn't intended to
bother with this, but the Loongson MMI implementation demonstrated
that there is still academic value to the MMX implementation, as an
algorithmic model for other 64-bit vector implementations. Thus, it
is desirable to improve its readability in the same manner as that of
the SSE2 implementation.
This is a common practice in other infrastructure libraries, such as
OpenSSL and libpng, because it makes it easy to examine an application
binary and determine which version of the library the application was
linked against.
Closes#66
The convention used by libjpeg:
type * variable;
is not very common anymore, because it looks too much like
multiplication. Some (particularly C++ programmers) prefer to tuck the
pointer symbol against the type:
type* variable;
to emphasize that a pointer to a type is effectively a new type.
However, this can also be confusing, since defining multiple variables
on the same line would not work properly:
type* variable1, variable2; /* Only variable1 is actually a
pointer. */
This commit reformats the entirety of the libjpeg-turbo code base so
that it uses the same code formatting convention for pointers that the
TurboJPEG API code uses:
type *variable1, *variable2;
This seems to be the most common convention among C programmers, and
it is the convention used by other codec libraries, such as libpng and
libtiff.
The IJG README file has been renamed to README.ijg, in order to avoid
confusion (many people were assuming that that was our project's README
file and weren't reading README-turbo.txt) and to lay the groundwork for
markdown versions of the libjpeg-turbo README and build instructions.
