diff --git a/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/SpellApiToAi.java b/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/SpellApiToAi.java
index 957abd27d41..b7f5d88d664 100644
--- a/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/SpellApiToAi.java
+++ b/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/SpellApiToAi.java
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ public enum SpellApiToAi {
             .put(ApiType.UnattachAll, UnattachAllAi.class)
             .put(ApiType.Untap, UntapAi.class)
             .put(ApiType.UntapAll, UntapAllAi.class)
-            .put(ApiType.Venture, AlwaysPlayAi.class)
+            .put(ApiType.Venture, VentureAi.class)
             .put(ApiType.Vote, VoteAi.class)
             .put(ApiType.WinsGame, GameWinAi.class)
 
diff --git a/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/ability/VentureAi.java b/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/ability/VentureAi.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e836ad3fde2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/forge-ai/src/main/java/forge/ai/ability/VentureAi.java
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+package forge.ai.ability;
+
+import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import forge.ai.AiPlayDecision;
+import forge.ai.AiProps;
+import forge.ai.PlayerControllerAi;
+import forge.ai.SpellAbilityAi;
+import forge.card.ICardFace;
+import forge.game.player.Player;
+import forge.game.player.PlayerActionConfirmMode;
+import forge.game.spellability.SpellAbility;
+import forge.util.Aggregates;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+public class VentureAi extends SpellAbilityAi {
+    @Override
+    protected boolean canPlayAI(Player aiPlayer, SpellAbility sa) {
+        // TODO: is it ever a bad idea to venture into a dungeon?
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    protected boolean doTriggerAINoCost(Player aiPlayer, SpellAbility sa, boolean mandatory) {
+        return mandatory || canPlayAI(aiPlayer, sa);
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public boolean confirmAction(Player player, SpellAbility sa, PlayerActionConfirmMode mode, String message) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    // AI that handles choosing the next room in a dungeon
+    @Override
+    public SpellAbility chooseSingleSpellAbility(Player player, SpellAbility sa, List<SpellAbility> spells, Map<String, Object> params) {
+        List<SpellAbility> viableRooms = Lists.newArrayList();
+
+        for (SpellAbility room : spells) {
+            if (player.getController().isAI()) { // FIXME: is this needed? Can simulation ever run this for a non-AI player?
+                if (((PlayerControllerAi)player.getController()).getAi().canPlaySa(room) == AiPlayDecision.WillPlay) {
+                    viableRooms.add(room);
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        if (!viableRooms.isEmpty()) {
+            // choose a room at random from the ones that are deemed playable
+            return Aggregates.random(viableRooms);
+        }
+
+        return Aggregates.random(spells); // If we're here, we should choose at least something, so choose a random thing then
+    }
+
+    // AI that chooses which dungeon to venture into
+    @Override
+    public String chooseCardName(Player ai, SpellAbility sa, List<ICardFace> faces) {
+        // TODO: improve the conditions that define which dungeon is a viable option to choose
+        List<String> dungeonNames = Lists.newArrayList();
+        for (ICardFace face : faces) {
+            dungeonNames.add(face.getName());
+        }
+
+        // Don't choose Tomb of Annihilation when life in danger unless we can win right away or can't lose for 0 life
+        if (ai.getController().isAI()) { // FIXME: is this needed? Can simulation ever run this for a non-AI player?
+            int lifeInDanger = (((PlayerControllerAi) ai.getController()).getAi().getIntProperty(AiProps.AI_IN_DANGER_THRESHOLD));
+            if ((ai.getLife() <= lifeInDanger && !ai.cantLoseForZeroOrLessLife())
+                    && !(ai.getLife() > 1 && ai.getWeakestOpponent().getLife() == 1)) {
+                dungeonNames.remove("Tomb of Annihilation");
+            }
+        }
+
+        return Aggregates.random(dungeonNames);
+    }
+}